2000 Land Rover Range Rover 4.0 review from Australia and New Zealand
"One to avoid unless you get it cheap!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Constant attention required with the brakes/ABS.
Air suspension got stuck in certain modes.
Climate Control constantly needed attention.
EMS had to be replaced.
Exterior mirror vibrated in the wind at speed.
General comments?
Fine for towing.
Good off road if it doesn't break down.
Useless performance-wise, to the point of frustration.
Boring plastic interior.
Absolutely atrocious build quality for a car costing this much.
Recommended reviews
| Get a Volvo 4x4 if you want quality |
| 1999 - Range Rover HSE 4.6 V8 petrol The Range Rover is very poor value for money |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 4.0 V8 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 3 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 1 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 20 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 15000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Porsche 911 |
| Date of Entry | 12th February, 2004 |