1998 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C200K review from Sweden
"Very good worker for the money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Only a fuel pump.
General comments?
Car is great, but beware of the fuel mass sensor! It could make many strange problems that can lead you to wrong conclusions!
Choose a Classic or Elegance, not Sport or Esprit version because of ride comfort, and the tyres should be 195/65 r15, nothing beside that!
Recommended reviews
| 1998 - C-Class C240 Sport 2.4 V6 Deeply disappointing |
|
| Boring!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1998 |
| Year of manufacture | 1998 |
| First year of ownership | 2007 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2009 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 supercharged Manual |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 190000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 220000 kilometres |
| Previous car | BMW 525 |
| Date of Entry | 18th March, 2009 |