Similar Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

2002
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML-500

The most hideously expensive piece of garbage ever produced

282 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML320

Mediocre at best; you don't look good pushing it

236 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML320

Expensive to maintain, and disappointed

215 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML500

It performs as advertised, and I like it

195 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML320

An unreliable unsafe vehicle

170 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML500

An expensive mistake

152 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

M-Class ML320

Mechanically good, body cheap rubbish,

139 words
All Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

2002 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML500 review from North America

"It performs as advertised, and I like it"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

The brakes needed replacement at 20000 miles.

A factory wheel alignment problem wore out tires at 20000 miles, but it is now fixed. I use the factory installed Dunlop brand tires for replacement, with no problem.

I replaced two light bulbs: 1 Headlight & 1 brake light.

The plastic windshield water washer tank was replaced under warrantee after 1 year of service.

The battery failed after 1 year of service.

General comments?

Still using a free replacement battery.

The dealer changes the Mobil 1 oil at every 10000 miles and there is no need for adding more oil en between changes. All warranty repairs were made during the regular 10000 mile service appointments.

The dealer provides me with a free loaner Benz at every 10000 mile inspection. Inspections and service is completed on the same day.

This is my 2nd ML. The first one was a 1998 ML320 which performed as well as this ML500, but I like the smoothness of an 8 cylinder engine.

I have owned five used Mercedes vehicles since 1969, including a 280SE which is waiting to be restored. It has over 260000 miles on the original untouched fuel injected 6 cyl. engine.

1 comment

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

2002 - M-Class ML320 3.2

Expensive to maintain, and disappointed

USA Flag Canada Flag

2001 - M-Class 320

I like it still, I wish it were better

All 2002 Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Model year2002
Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 5 liter Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 9.0 / 10
Distance when acquired15 miles
Most recent distance65000 miles
Previous carMercedes-Benz M-Class
Date of Entry 20th February, 2008

All Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews