Similar Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

2001
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML430

An expensive Sports Utility Vehicle with way too many problems to be worth it

90 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class Elegance

High performance, good price. It's a Benz!!

56 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class

Very good, but wish they had a diesel in them

41 words
2000
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML

A 98% well designed car, poorly built

323 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML320

An expensive car to have in the shop

278 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class 320

A high priced SUV that requires frequent trips to the dealership for repairs

222 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

M-Class ML430

High price mechanical boondoggle!

211 words
All Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

2000 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML review from North America

"A 98% well designed car, poorly built"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Power Steering Hose blew at 9,000 mile

Power Steering Hose blew at 24,000 miles

Power Steering hose blew at 37,000 miles

Tape player & navigation systems replaced at 37,000miles

AC not working - replaced cooling assist fans at 9,000 miles

AC not working - replaced front cooling fans 24,000 miles

Navigation system gets lost - replaced Antenna (water intrusion) 2 times

Sun-Roof Jammed - entire assembly replaced at 34,000 miles

Excessive wear on front middle arm rest - replaced at 24,000 miles

Head light went out at 6,000 miles

Gas tank access door locking mechanism frequently jams - numerous complaints

Rear seat release cable broke at 35,000

Transmission leaks - continuous - no resolution yet

Glove Box is currently broken - can't close without pushing up on door

Rear hatch hydraulic support is leaking

Rear Pads worn down to the metal at 15,000 miles - No sensor light - replacement cost for just rear was $554

Rear Brakes again worn at 31,000 fronts still OK. Sensor still does not work even though replaced at 15,000 miles.

General comments?

1st let me say I love driving this car, however:

I have owned a 78 450SL, a 96 320E, a 2002 320E, a 318 BMW, 528 BMW,535 BMW, and as a result have a general feel as to how long brake pads should wear. When I complained about only 15,000 miles of wear on the rear pads which also required rotor replacement, having had no warning, I was told by the service manager that I was lucky, that many customers were only getting 12,000 miles. When I pushed the issue with the manager of the dealership, I was told that all sophisticated drivers know that high performance cars like the Mercedes will only get 10,000 to 15,000 miles wear on their pads. I took this fight all the way up to a VP in New Jersey, and got nothing, but arrogance.

I can't imagine buying another Mercedes.

2 comments

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

2001 - M-Class 320 gasoline 3.2L V6 215hp 233lb./ft. torque

Not the best car, but certainly an engineering masterpiece

USA Flag Canada Flag

2000 - M-Class ML320

An expensive car to have in the shop

All 2000 Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Year of manufacture2000
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 430 Automatic
Performance marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 3 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 2 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 4.6 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance46000 miles
Previous carBMW 5 Series
Date of Entry 20th February, 2004

All Mercedes-Benz M-Class reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews