2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK 200 review from UK and Ireland
"Excelent car, feel cheated as it required more maintenence than I would have expected"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The front tyres needed replacing at 8,000 miles, as they were worn on the outside edge. I was told by the dealership that this a common problem with the vehicle.
Again at the first 10,000 mile service I was advised that the front brake pads needed replaceing.
General comments?
I bought the car as I expected quality with the Mercedes name. I would have expected the tyres and brakes to have lasted a lot longer.
Search for New and Used Mercedes-Benz SLKs available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended reviews
|
| Sex on Wheels |
|
| 2001 - SLK 230 Kompressor 2.3L Super Charged The only open top / coupe that does't have the limitations of either |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 Manual |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 6 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 10500 miles |
| Previous car | BMW 3 Series |
| Date of Entry | 2nd December, 2003 |