2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK review from North America
"Terrible"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
After purchasing the certified used 2002 SLK 320 (31, 988 miles) in June 2005, I drove the vehicle for about 5,000 miles until engine malfunctioned and the rods bent. Took it Mercedes dealer for repair since still under warranty. Had a Mercedes specialist inspect the damage. Was informed Mercedes would not cover it. The reason was water in the engine. Neither I or previous owner drove in flood water.
Has anyone else had engine problems with the SLK320? Feel free to respond to chuck.hill@jeffersonwells.com.
General comments?
Not happy with Mercedes. Have had other mechanical failures with this vehicle.
Recommended reviews
| Sex on Wheels |
|
| 2001 - SLK 230 2.3 Litre supercharged More of a gentleman's GT than a true sportscar, but one that exudes class and refinement |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 2002 |
| Year of manufacture | 2001 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 320 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 0 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 1 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 1 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 31988 miles |
| Most recent distance | 37009 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Explorer |
| Date of Entry | 17th October, 2005 |