2004 Mercedes-Benz Vito 109 CDI review from Serbia
"Plastic"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Why did MB change the front wheel drive from the previous model of the Vito, to a "not working because I am light on back" rear wheel drive in new models?
And of course the whole interior is squeaky after 100k km.
Oh, I almost forgot, the paint gone has matte, the car has lost its shine.
They must work on these vehicles, or they will lose.
General comments?
The cabin is very gloomy and the seats are uncomfortable.
Recommended reviews
| It looks nice, that's all |
|
| Expensive and not profitable for business |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2005 |
| Year of manufacture | 2004 |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2009 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.2 diesel Manual |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 100000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Mercedes-Benz Vito |
| Date of Entry | 25th September, 2009 |