1997 Mercedes-Benz Vito 110D review from Belgium
"One sentence? I could write a (horror-) book about it..."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Engine (44,000 kms).
Aircon.
Driver's seat.
Auto-transmission.
Brakes.
Several small items (lights, switches etc...)
General comments?
I had to wait 7 months to get it (although they promised 3 at first).
The time when MB-cars where known as "just fill it up and ride it" have long been gone...).
It's impossible to ride from one service interval to the other without something going wrong.
Recommended reviews
| A good engine with lots of go |
|
| 1995 - Vito 110D 2.3L turbo diesel Worst Piece of Crap Money Hole Ever |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1997 |
| First year of ownership | 1997 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.3 turbo diesel Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 4 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 3 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 182000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Volkswagen Passat |
| Date of Entry | 18th September, 2000 |