1992 Mercury Topaz GS review from North America
"It's reliable, and while it's not a Porsche, it performs well (with the V6) and handles well"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The rear inside door handle broke, but it was my fault.
General comments?
This car has good performance. The four-cylinder Topaz, from what I hear, is a lot slower at acceleration.
I've never had any problems with it and it looks great. All I've done is what the manual says. I know other people with the same car and they all say it's pretty reliable too.
Recommended reviews
| Best first car! |
|
| 1991 - Topaz L 2.3L (140c.i.) I-4 A respect-worthy car that gets very little respect |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 1994 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 35000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 74300 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Citation |
| Date of Entry | 18th April, 2001 |