Similar Mitsubishi Pajero reviews

2002
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Pajero Sport GLS

If running costs were lowered, this would be the best option for a 4x4 on road and off road

260 words
Australia Flag New Zealand Flag

Pajero GLX

Underrated alternative to Toyota/Nissan

220 words
Australia Flag New Zealand Flag

Pajero IO TR

Brilliant

151 words
2001
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Pajero GLS

Looks great, but let down by performance and running costs

720 words
Israel Flag

Pajero GLX

Really Strong, "almost" perfectly comfortable,

192 words
Sweden Flag

Pajero

56 words
Greece Flag

Pajero Pinin GDI

More than an SUV!!!

22 words
All Mitsubishi Pajero reviews

2001 Mitsubishi Pajero GLS review from UK and Ireland

"Looks great, but let down by performance and running costs"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

The tan coloured paint started chipping off the dashboard revealing the base colour of the plastic beneath (black).

The switch that was supposed to lower the electric aerial to half height (to allow access to low-ceiling multi-storey car parks etc) never worked.

Engine oil disappeared during run-in period. Was fine after a top-up.

General comments?

The actual model of vehicle I am reviewing is a Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLS. It was an Irish imported version of the Shogun Sport (previously called the Challenger). It's basically a Mitsubishi 4-Life pickup with the rear end re-modelled as an estate car.

I was completely sold on it's looks - all metallic maroon paint and chrome. Everything about it suggested power. I remember looking at the ludicrous air intake on the bonnet and thinking it looked like the snorting nostril of an angry bull.

Sadly though, it was all looks and not much power. The 2.5L TD engine belonged to a bygone era. It only produced 99bhp and the torque figures were equally unremarkable (177lb/ft at 2000rpm). It's modern rivals (Toyota Landcruiser Colorado, Isuzu Trooper, Nissan Terrano) all offered significantly superior engines in terms of performance and economy. I note that the very latest version of the Sport has a revised 2.5TD engine that produces about 115bhp - so it must have been a common criticism.

On the road, the Sport was s-l-o-w. 60mph arrived in about 18.5 seconds - although the low gearing gave the impression that it was quicker. It was also a very noisy and unrefined beast - which I kinda liked in a "macho" sort of way... Motorway cruising at "normal" speeds however was, at best, a tense experience with the rev counter round at 4000rpm (high for a diesel).

The Sport's handling was rather entertaining. Being rear-wheel drive, the rear end used flip out with only the slightest encouragement. Often this would happen when changing up into second gear whilst making a turn. The fact that it was very easy to catch and control made for some unexpected fun. Suspension was quite firm and body roll minimal which meant, overall, I felt confident chucking the vehicle around at relatively high speeds.

Off-road, it was difficult to gauge the Sport's performance because of it's hybrid tyres. On the odd occasion I did some mud-plugging it coped very well (much to the Defender-driving guide's surprise). It also made very light work of towing a friend's broken down Jeep Grand Cherokee to safety.

One thing that really disappointed me about the Sport was driver's comfort. My foot-well was cramped (no footrest next to the clutch pedal) and the pedals were small and squashed together by the bulging transmission tunnel. If on long journeys I wanted to rest my clutch foot, I'd have to squeeze it under the clutch pedal. Everyone else though could relax in near-palatial comfort. The boot-space was vast, though the actual floor was about waist-height which could make loading/unloading of heavy items a little awkward. Cabin storage was disappointing with not enough cubby-holes.

The tan leather interior was very tasteful (my import was spared nasty imitation walnut as seen in UK spec models) and the carpet was so thick you could loose small children in it. The equipment level however, was disappointing for top GLS spec. Basic air conditioning and heated front seats was about as flash as it got. I even had to get my own CD multi-changer fitted! Security was a joke with only a basic immobiliser and no deadlocks.

Running costs was not one of the Sport's strong points. I'd be lucky to get 350 miles out of £50 worth of diesel. I reckon it must have returned about 25mpg on average. Servicing was every 6500 miles and insurance (due to "import" status), was about £1000 a year which, for a 30 year old with clean driving license and a "safe" area address, is scandalous.

Despite it's shortcomings, I loved this vehicle. I had always wanted to own a big 4x4. Ideally I would have coupled it with a small town car for running short errands with, but ultimately the running cost proved too much and it had to go. It broke my heart!

If I ever buy a big 4x4 again, I'll buy a petrol V6 or V8 that's been converted to LPG. And no more imports!

Comment on this review

United Kingdom Flag Search for New and Used Mitsubishi Pajeros available in the UK

Click here to advertise your car

Recommended reviews

Australia Flag New Zealand Flag

2002 - Pajero GLX 3.5 petrol

Underrated alternative to Toyota/Nissan

Israel Flag

2001 - Pajero GLX 3.2 turbo diesel

Really Strong, "almost" perfectly comfortable,

All 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Year of manufacture2001
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 2.5TD Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 3 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 6.5 / 10
Distance when acquired0 miles
Most recent distance11500 miles
Previous carNissan Primera
Date of Entry 25th October, 2002

All Mitsubishi Pajero reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews