1995 Nissan 200SX review from North America
"Excellent economy car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
150k miles.
Front struts and CV boot replacement.
158k miles.
Fuel injector for # 4 cylinder.
Spark plugs. (general wear)
AC does not get cold. I will have it repaired this spring.
General comments?
Excellent car to drive. 7000 miles in one month in 2007.
34 to 38 mpg, 34 mpg at 75-80 mph is impressive in my book.
The 1.6 liter engine has excellent acceleration, 5 speed does help with this. Much stronger than my 91 Escort with a 1.9l engine. The Escort was problem free for me.
Tires last extremely well on this car.
Interior is in excellent shape. Body is also in excellent shape. No external rust at all.
Spray the locks once a year and they still work as good as new.
No wind noise from the door seals.
I am currently looking to buy another one for my daughter to drive.
I do not baby the car at all. I drive it daily and would not trade it for anything.
Recommended reviews
| Luxury and reliable for a great price! |
|
| And the Jap cars get another prize for worst made car! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1995 |
| Year of manufacture | 1994 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 Manual |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 105000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 160000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Taurus |
| Date of Entry | 5th March, 2009 |