1995 Nissan 240SX SE review from North America
"Since Nissans depreciate heavily and are still well built, used car buyers are getting a great deal"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Right wheelbearing was going bad; the previous owner lowered the suspension so that may have caused or affected it. My mechanic has checked it bumper to bumper and says it's superb.
General comments?
I love this car. After 100,000 miles the engine still purrs like a kitten. Producing 160lbs-ft it has plenty of passing power.
Please note: The SE trim is worth every extra penny.
Recommended reviews
| Freaking amazing |
| Fun to drive and look at, not worth it though |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.4L Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 100000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 105000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Ranger |
| Date of Entry | 18th August, 2000 |