1995 Nissan 300ZX review from North America
"A true classic sports car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
No repairs other than expected wear parts like brakes and timing belt.
General comments?
What a great sports car was meant to be. The 1995 is my third Z car and a wonderful return to true sports car handling and zip after my 1986 300ZX which was classy, but sluggish.
I purchased this Z used with about 50,000 miles on it and it now has about 90,000. This Z, like all I have had, has been very trouble free. Of course a car with this much power is a tire eater and hard composition tires just won't work. I have had very good performance from the old Bridgestone Potenza RE71's when they were available and now I am riding on Kumho Ecsta Supras that have excellent traction and handling. I do not yet know if they will get more than the 14,000-15,000 miles that I usually get on Z tires, but am hoping.
I did have to replace the clutch cylinders and timing belt/water pump, but I consider these to be normal wear and tear.
If you want a sports car that you can depend on and which will drive and look like a dream I would definitely recommend a Z, especially the 1995, 1996 300ZX with or without the Turbo. As for me, when this one is finished with me I will most definitely be purchasing a 350ZX.
Thank you Nissan, thank you.
Recommended reviews
  | 1995 - 300ZX Twin Turbo 3.0 24 Valve - turbo Reliable Speed |
| A blast to drive, and looks good too |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | Twin turbo Manual |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 3/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 50000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 90000 miles |
| Previous car | Nissan 300ZX |
| Date of Entry | 6th October, 2002 |