1995 Nissan Pathfinder LX review from North America
"NO good for anything"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
We have a 1995 Nissan Pathfinder that was just taken in for it's 240,000 km full service. A cost of $500. We were notified after Nissan had performed the service that our vehicle is no longer road safe due to extensive rust in the rear part of the frame around the gas tank area. The rust is so bad that the technician found numerous perforations in the frame and that we could lose our gas tank at any time.
General comments?
We have always maintained this vehicle with regular service visits at Nissan.
We are now in a position to find a new vehicle since this is not safe to drive and we cannot sell it since it will not pass inspection.
The vehicle is in excellent condition transmission, body and interior are all in great shape.
I think Nissan should compensate people for putting out poor quality on a vehicle which has a reputation for going for miles and miles beyond others.
If anyone know of someone to contact for this, let us know.
Recommended reviews
| 1995 - Pathfinder SE, LE, XE 3.0 Nice to use on toll highways with cameras |
|
| Transmission Eater! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 1995 |
| Year of manufacture | 1994 |
| First year of ownership | 1995 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2007 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 1 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 9000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 245000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Honda Accord |
| Date of Entry | 22nd August, 2007 |