1987 Nissan Pulsar NX review from North America
"Not a bad purchase, but she's getting old"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Head Gasket
Entire Transmission.
General comments?
I bought this car because I loved the look of it, and I still do to this day. Unfortunately because of rust, transmission problems, slowness, and high kilometers, I must sell it. Honda will be my next purchase. The T-Tops are a HUGE advantage, and the rarity of this sleek looking sports car once in a while turns heads. I'm sorry did I say sports car? I meant sports coupe, because although it looks fast, it's just the opposite. The acceleration is sluggish (which is sad for such a light car), but the handling is definitely satisfying.
Recommended reviews
| One of the best economy cars ever built |
|
| A piece of junk, but it's so old it's to be expected |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1987 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 4 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 170000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 178000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 25th November, 2002 |