1994 Nissan Sentra LE review from North America
"Cheaper version of 1980's 3 series - good performance and reliability at the best price"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I had the starter replaced at 65k.
Bad axle at 72,000 (replaced 2 weeks ago). That was actually my fault: I revved the engine in Neutral and pulled in Drive. Don't do that with a small car.
General comments?
I love how the car handles. Sharp turns and precise steering. If I set the right tire pressure I could compare my Sentra with a Golf or older BMW.
The acceleration is very good for a 1.6, especially 1st and 2nd.
I like the small engine, very responsive.
Good body work, very little rust.
35 mpg.
Recommended reviews
| I didn't enjoy the car, but I have heard good thing from other owners |
|
| 1993 - Sentra 4 door base model 1.6L, 4 cylinder It is made out of awesome |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1994 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 twin cam Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 40000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 72000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 26th December, 2002 |