1997 Nissan Vanette Cargo P3 review from Hungary
What things have gone wrong with the car?
After the first 15000 kms the differential had a very strange noise (The partly self-locking diff wasn't filled up with the correct amount, and make of oil). The dealer fixed it, but it only needed a week and it started from the beginning (they should have changed it, but they are still messing around, with strange ideas).
We also had problems with the gearbox as well. It was very hard work to get it in the gear you wanted. The dealers (because I have tried 3 different) appeared to be awful.
We also found these dealer services awfully expensive. I'm a car mechanic. I'm working with Alfas, Lancias, Fiats. I know that even these sporty Italian cars are a lot cheaper to service (roughly a third).
But the engine is the best part of the Vanette (2.3 naturally asp. Diesel). Stronger than expected, reliable, low on fuel, like a dream come true.
I think the only reason I will never buy a Nissan again is the dealers. It's a pity.
General comments?
A useful, large vehicle, with a good engine. The optional rear seats are less comfy for longer distance, than the front ones. It can carry 1000 kgs without a problem. The most fantastic thing is, that even full loaded it only needed 7.5 litres/100 kms (average speed around 100km/h).
If you have one, do NOT take it to original dealers!! They are worth nothing. I am going to do it by myself.
Recommended reviews
Cheaper option | |
| 1997 - Vanette Cargo 2.3 diesel Complete rubbish |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1997 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.3 diesel |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Date of Entry | 7th February, 1999 |