1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass review from North America
"Best looking car to date, in it's class"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
This is my second Cutlass Supreme SL, my first one was totaled out by my little sister, however I had no previous problems with my first cutlass until a Ford Expedition came along and took out the passenger side. Any who, both cars combined I put about 22,000 miles on, I have done nothing to either car with exception to oil changes every 3,000 miles and air filters.
General comments?
This car starts every morning with out problems (unless you leave on the interior lights).
Both 3.1's that I have owned, sound like they have a bit of a lifter knock to them. I just ignore it and change the oil regularly. Other 3.1's that I have heard sound the same, but it don't sound right. I dunno.
The car handles like a dream, looks great when all waxed up.
As far as subs in the trunk, the lid sucks, it is really hard to keep the rattle out, even with dynamat.
I like the 95 dash better than the early 94 dash.
Recommended reviews
| Great Performance If You Can Get it Worked On |
|
| 1993 - Cutlass Supreme SL 3.1L V6 Predictable and fun! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1994 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 52000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 55000 miles |
| Previous car | Oldsmobile Cutlass |
| Date of Entry | 14th June, 2003 |