1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass review from North America
"Not worth it, unless you got it brand new"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Let's see, I have had to have the brakes, muffler, transmission, and the fuel pump fixed. The motor head cracked on me; (which made me have to get another car). So in the long run I had the car for about 7 months and I probably put about 3,000 dollars worth of work into it for nothing.
General comments?
It was running well, for a while, and it was pretty comfortable, but with so many problems with the car it just was one big head ache.
Recommended reviews
| 1993 - Cutlass supreme international series 3.4 DOHC V6 A Good design with poor engineering |
|
| 1992 - Cutlass Supreme SL 3.1L OHV V6 Beats an Accord, hands down |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 1993 |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 2 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 0 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 1 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 270000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 300000 kilometres |
| Previous car | None None |
| Date of Entry | 8th December, 2005 |