2000 Perodua Kancil 850EZ review from Malaysia
"Convenient"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
No performance.
General comments?
The car is good for short distance trips and city driving.
I have two other cars (Avanza i.3M) and Saga 1.5I M, but I am driving the Kancil more. I truly enjoy driving it and currently adding performance parts to get more power, and it's not disappointing.
Recommended reviews
| Maintenance is cheap and get you to where you going without hassle |
|
| Low maintenance and high on reliability |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2001 |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2007 |
| Engine and transmission | 850cc Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 45000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 50588 kilometres |
| Previous car | Toyota Avanza |
| Date of Entry | 4th April, 2007 |