1992 Pontiac Bonneville SE Sedan review from North America
"A high maintenance auto"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Interior trim falling apart in the first year.
Second year I replaced the alternator 3 times.
Interior trim continues to fall apart; poor plastic; inferior floor carpet.
Replaced back brakes at 50,000 miles.
Car serviced according to the manufacturer's specifications.
65,000 replaced the front brake pads and master cylinder.
General comments?
Would never purchase a General Motors auto, including this Pontiac.
Recommended reviews
| The Bonneville is a great car, very underrated in my opinion |
|
| Reliable and roomy. A pleasure to own and drive! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 1992 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | V-6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 3 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 3 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 5 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 720 miles |
| Most recent distance | 65000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Mustang |
| Date of Entry | 23rd August, 2000 |