1999 Pontiac Grand Am review from North America
"Everything that looks good is not good"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I just purchased the car one week ago from the dealer.
Already I had to take it back. The brakes were grinding, the dealer said it was normal. But they fixed the problem. The dealer said the problem was due to metallic brakes, But I knew better.
The driver side is leaking water from under the car. The dealer said it was due to the air condition or the heater.
The car drives slower than the amount of acceleration you put to it.
General comments?
I like the car, it rides good.
But looks aren't everything.
Recommended reviews
| This car was good for the first 100,000 miles, but after that it should have been pushed off a cliff |
|
| Worthless, Unreliable, and Poorly Built |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1999 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 6 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 59000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 59679 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Taurus |
| Date of Entry | 28th January, 2003 |