2002 Pontiac Grand Prix GT review from North America
"I am totally happy"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing has gone wrong, knock on wood...
General comments?
I also owned a 1999 Pontiac Gran Prix and to be honest it was a better vehicle than the newer version. The stereo system was much better so I was disappointed with this. The 199 model topped out at 140 and the 2002 tops out at 105.
I cannot believe that GM changed this model in 2005?
Recommended reviews
| Good looks means nothing |
|
| 2001 - Grand Prix 2001 Pontiac SE 3.1 V6 An expensive piece of Junk! No Wonder GM is Having Financial problem it is losing all its costumers |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2002 |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 128 miles |
| Most recent distance | 47000 miles |
| Previous car | Pontiac Grand Prix |
| Date of Entry | 13th September, 2005 |