2000 Pontiac Montana review from North America
"Unreliable"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Had it 6 months, needed new fuel pump.
Ten days later it needed a new fuel line.
Poor starting.
Recommended reviews
| Maintenance nightmare |
|
| Not worth a tank of gas |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | Don't Know |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 3 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 100 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 11000 kilometres |
| Previous car | GMC Suburban |
| Date of Entry | 29th May, 2001 |