Similar Renault Clio reviews

2002
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Clio dynamique

Unreliable!

742 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Clio 172 Sport

Can't get a better equipped performance hatch for the money

670 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Clio RenaultSport 172

Brilliant car - does everything I want it to!

550 words
Greece Flag

Clio Dynamique

A small, but grown-up car, which is a pleasure to own and serves its owner well

539 words

Clio Expression

Reliability comes first, so think about it

523 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Clio Expression +

Good image, but lives up to its bad reputation

433 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

Clio Extreme

Nice to drive, but very unreliable

395 words
All Renault Clio reviews

2002 Renault Clio Dynamique review from Greece

"A small, but grown-up car, which is a pleasure to own and serves its owner well"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Due to a design flaw, I requested a replacement for the glovebox lid at 3000 km. Afterwards, this design flaw affected the new lid too, so I decided to live with it rather than start replacing glovebox lid after glovebox lid.

At around 40000 km I had to replace the driver's side CV and wheel bearing.

At 67000 km, the passenger-side window guide broke and the whole assembly had to be replaced.

At 75000 km, the same part gave trouble.

At 80000 km, the exhaust started showing signs of wear.

General comments?

The car was purchased new, and was in my opinion, the one with the highest perceived quality in the B-segment. In fact, it appeared to be every bit as solidly built as the German "benchmarks" (the already ancient back then, Golf Mk-II based, Polo - and don't get me started on the Opel Corsa), and a test drive convinced me that it handled very nicely and provided the ride quality one would expect from a grown-up car.

The handling was very friendly, with bags of grip; the rear twist-beam axle (which, handily, came equipped with an anti-roll bar) participated in the car's positioning mid-bend, giving the car a very sporty feel not unlike that of the 2.0 sport version or even the glorious Peugeot 106 Rallye. Nimble, precise and inspiring. It was also remarkably stable at very high speeds on motorways (we're talking about speeds exceeding 160 km/h).

The steering was not particularly quick, and unfortunately, the turning circle was atrocious. It was rather nicely weighted, though, and provided a decent amount of information and feedback to the driver's hands.

The gearbox never missed a change, had a nicely short throw, but it wasn't particularly precise.

The brakes were adequately powerful, although the pedal had an initial dead area.

The driving position was a pain. The car had the same semi-bucket seats as the 2.0-liter Sport version, but their backs were too low and the lumbar support adjustment was barely effective. Things were made even worse by the fact that the steering column's rake was truck-like and no amount of adjustment would fix that.

The glovebox lid's design was seriously flawed: the side that was closer to the driver was unsupported, so it eventually (especially if "aided" by a hand resting for even a fraction of a second on the open lid) had its "hinge" (which was basically just a long piece of notched plastic) deformed and the part closer to the driver wouldn't close properly. This meant that the switch for the glovebox light on the inside didn't get turned off, so you'd be driving at night with the glovebox light on. Renault suggested a U-shaped piece of metal to be inserted where the lid latched. They could have just moved the switch to another place instead...

The rear seats weren't made for tall persons; headroom and legroom were limited.

However, it managed to absorb the irregularities of greek roads very well, and so it was a pleasure to drive for long distances.

The engine provided good performance for the car's class (as long as you didn't expect to do any serious overtaking with the A/C on) and managed to give excellent fuel consumption. I loved that motor.

Comment on this review

Recommended reviews

UK Flag Ireland Flag

2002 - Clio RenaultSport 172 2.0 16v petrol

Brilliant car - does everything I want it to!

2002 - Clio Expression 1.2 16v

Reliability comes first, so think about it

All 2002 Renault Clio reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Model year2002
Year of manufacture2002
First year of ownership2002
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 1.2 16v Manual
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 9 / 10
Dealer Service marks 9 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired4 kilometres
Most recent distance87500 kilometres
Previous carLancia Y10
Date of Entry 10th September, 2009

All Renault Clio reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews