1995 Rover - Austin 200 214 SEI review from UK and Ireland
"Quick, cheap and with loads of kit"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The alternator failed at 72000 miles which isn't bad and a replacement was cheaply bought from a scrap yard.
The dashboard binnacle vibrated when driven over 60mph.
General comments?
The car was a high spec car for the money I paid for it with alloy wheels, half leather seats and electric windows.
For a 1.4 the K series engine is very lively, but needs to be revved to get the best from it, unfortunately it handles like a big heavy car with lots of under-steer and vague steering.
Search for New and Used Rover - Austin 200s available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended reviews
| 1995 - 200 214 Cabriolet SE 1.4 K Series Smashing for the price! |
| Why do people blindly dislike Rovers?! It's a mystery!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.4 petrol Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 6 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 6 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 69000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 74000 miles |
| Previous car | Rover - Austin Metro |
| Date of Entry | 4th February, 2004 |