1997 Rover - Austin 200 214 Si review from UK and Ireland
"Low cost performance with comfort"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Engine management system (ECU) failed but was replaced free of charge even out of warranty.
Cylinder head gasket at approx 50k - not so good!
Rear silencer box.
General comments?
Underrated car. Goes like a rocket if you keep the revs above 5k. Keep the revs down and get 40 or more mpg. Handles like a big mini so you can really chuck it around but watch for the understeer.
Running costs (excluding servicing) are low. Loads of fun for a good price.
A few niggles - the driver's side door mirror doesn't go far enough out for me.
The left foot rest is uncomfortable.
Quite a few rattles and squeaks from the dash area.
The sun visor will not stay in position - it 'snaps' onto the windscreen on a spring.
Haven't looked at the newer 25 but these criticisms might have been sorted by now.
Servicing at my local dealer is VERY expensive!
Overall, I like it a lot and would buy another.
Search for New and Used Rover - Austin 200s available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended reviews
|
| If you are over 60 please don't buy this car, your giving it a bad image |
|
| The 214Si: A compact, speedy, suave looking wolf in sheep's clothing |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1997 |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 1998 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.4 petrol Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 6 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 11000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 60000 miles |
| Previous car | Rover - Austin Metro 1.4 GSi |
| Date of Entry | 8th December, 2000 |