2000 Rover - Austin 25 iL review from UK and Ireland
"Cheap to run with good dynamics"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
When I test drove the car the warning light for the anti-lock brakes was on all the time. Caused by a faulty sensor and fixed by the dealer before I bought the car.
Rear seat back release lever seized after 2 months. Replaced under warranty.
General comments?
Performance is very good for a 1.6 engine. Economy is excellent too.
Seats are a bit too firm and don't hold you very well.
Handling is very sharp, way ahead of the 200.
The brakes are OK, but could be a bit more powerful.
Cabin is nice with better soundproofing than my previous Rover 400.
Search for New and Used Rover - Austin 25s available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended reviews
|
| A solid, well-built car with reasonable power and handling, cheap to buy and run |
|
| Great warm hatch with good handling, looks and practicality, rounded off with a great little engine! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 petrol Manual |
| Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 13500 miles |
| Most recent distance | 23000 miles |
| Previous car | Rover - Austin 400 |
| Date of Entry | 17th December, 2001 |