1996 Rover - Austin 400 416 Si from UK and Ireland - Comments

9th Jan 2001, 12:31

"Severely underrated, just watch out for depreciation"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Small leak from radiator hose repaired quickly under Rover Approved warranty.

The exhaust section in front of the cat rattles a bit, but this is apparently very common. An irritation rather than a fault.

General comments?

Underrated car. Ride is on the soft side so handling isn't very sharp but there's plenty of grip.

Engine is very energetic for its size, economical too.

Interior is very nice and comfortable, my only complaint is that the windows sometimes shudder when opened and the switches are fiddly.

Performance is very good for this class of car although the engine gets a bit noisy above 70mph.

The brakes are excellent with discs all round and ABS.

My only problems with this car are its rather high insurance costs and Rover main dealer servicing should be cheaper.


19th Jun 2001, 08:07

Insurance is HIGH HIGH HIGH

I'm 22, and am buying a 96 model... group 11! Even a Nissan Almera is group 4, and my current Clio is group 5.

How can this really be a group 11.?

Otherwise, it looks like a really nice car, and hopefully I should be getting mine at the weekend.

What are the running costs like, ie parts, services etc etc... anyone email me back? mball@unitedbusinessmedia.com.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Rover - Austin 400 reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews