1991 Rover - Austin 400 416 GTi Twin Cam 16v from UK and Ireland - Comments

30th May 2001, 21:00

"An underrated car"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Nothing major mechanically in the time I have had it, other than, when under warranty, the fuel pump seized, but it was repaired by the garage. Since then nothing significant has gone wrong.

I have serviced it once a year since I have had it anyway. The smaller things which have been a problem have just been wear and tear things like the interior, the seats have become untidy in appearance and the stitching on seats has come away.

General comments?

This car makes a brilliant first warm-hatch alternative, probably much better in manual form, but an automatic is an easy to drive kind of car.

My example was packed with more gadgets than a Safrane. 4 x electric windows, electric roof, mirrors, alloy wheels, full leather interior, what more do you need, ABS and air con maybe!!!


14th Aug 2004, 12:14

Isn't a Rover 416 GTi basically a reskinned Honda CRX? Because it has a Honda engine.


28th Oct 2006, 13:53

It's a more British, more 'old man' version of the CRX. Excellent cars though.


29th Oct 2006, 07:44

It may look pretty, well apart from the hideous rusty Wheel Arches, but it is still a Rover.Hence, very cheap and serious image problems. No way can an aging 416 be compared to a Honda CRX.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Rover - Austin 400 reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews