1992 Rover - Austin Metro S 5 door from UK and Ireland - Comments

14th Jun 2001, 08:49

"A cheap runabout that's also fun to drive"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Petrol tank breather pipe eroded (due to me brimming the tank every fill up for 4 years). Cost £10 to replace.

Patched up the insulation around the wiring loom to the windscreen wiper motor after very heavy rain and tyre spray blew the fuses.

General comments?

A very cheap car to run with no serious problems. The only costs were for routine parts and servicing.

The handling was great fun. Plenty of grip and communicative steering.

The ride was a little hard on poorly surfaced roads, but settled at higher speeds.

For the engine size, the car was fast. The engine was quiet and smooth, although wind and road noise did intrude at higher speeds.

The space in the back seat was a little tight but was fine for just occasional passengers.

I enjoyed owning and driving this car for 6 years, now my girlfriend drives it.


6th Sep 2001, 04:56

What a great review, spot on mate.

I had a Metro too and it was the best car I'd ever had for driving enjoyment.

The 1.1 K series engine was a gem; reliable, powerful and smooth.

The ride is hard, but that's probably why the handling is so good.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available. New comments appear in the Members Area before the main site

All Rover - Austin Metro reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews