2000 Saturn LS review from North America
"Terrible resale value"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Had to take the car in 3 times to have the sun roof radling fixed.
The sun roof seal had to be replaced.
There was an overspray on the car when I bought it. They tried to detail it, but did a terrible job.
General comments?
Would not recommend a saturn to anybody.
If you ever need parts, you are almost forced to buy from the dealer. When parts are available from a discount supplier, they are very expensive.
Saturn does have a very good service department.
The car has lost at least 50% of its resale value in less than 3 years.
Recommended reviews
| Stands up well to hard driving |
|
| A reliable, inexpensive car I'm very happy with |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.2 liter Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 175 miles |
| Most recent distance | 27800 miles |
| Previous car | Oldsmobile Ciera |
| Date of Entry | 13th October, 2003 |