1999 Saturn SL SL1 review from North America
"Cheap, reliable transportation, but don't get it if you want a lot of performance"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing serious has gone wrong so far. I hear a random rattling noise which nobody can seem to pinpoint, but other than that, I have had no problems with my Saturn.
General comments?
This is definetly not a high performance car, which is the only problem I have with it. It is very cheap and reliable. It is an absolutely gorgeous car inside and out. Everyone that sees it thinks it's a 2002 and I love the color.
Recommended reviews
| 1999 - SL SL2 1.9L DOHC four cylinder Amazingly reliable with minimal maintenance |
|
| 1998 - SL 2 1.9L 16-valve DOHC Affordable, unbreakable compact with the soul of a sport sedan |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1999 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.9 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 2 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 37000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 51000 miles |
| Previous car | Volvo 940 |
| Date of Entry | 27th February, 2002 |