1996 Saturn SL review from North America
"Good general car for the general driver"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
General wear and tear items nothing unexpected. A brake master cylinder went bad though, but at 85000 miles.
General comments?
This is a great car for the economy minded driver. It's a no-frills vehicle and handles and performs as such. Cheap to buy (originally) and cheap to own.
Recommended reviews
| What a piece of junk! |
|
| Avoid Saturn |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1996 |
| Year of manufacture | 1996 |
| First year of ownership | 1996 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | Manual |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 50 miles |
| Most recent distance | 114000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 3rd August, 2005 |