2005 Subaru Forester XS review from North America
"Definitely worth a close look if you're interested in this class of vehicle"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing so far, but still very new.
General comments?
I drove everything comparable and researched thoroughly and this vehicle was by far the best choice for me.
I recently moved to Cleveland area and my rear wheel drive Mercedes even with traction, was a bit scary at times last winter on my 25 mile commute. The AWD Subie should be far better. I'm almost looking forward to snow to see how it does.
Mileage so far has been about 30 mpg on the highway, which is mostly what I do. It uses regular fuel which the MB needed premium, as does the Turbo Forester XT.
Handling is excellent for an SUV. No tippy feel at all. I ended up hanging upside down in my overturned Explorer a few years ago (not my fault) and I don't want that to happen again.
Handles and rides almost as well as by MB and the 165 HP is plenty adequate.
Space is very good for a small SUV for both passengers and cargo.
I went with L.L. Bean package to get leather, sunroof (huge) and a couple of other features, but I mostly just liked the look better.
Recommended reviews
| 2005 - Forester LL Bean Edt. 2.5L The best small SUV out there, never changing back to another! |
|
| The perfect compromise, able to race or haul in all weather for reasonable cost |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2005 |
| Year of manufacture | 2004 |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.5L 4 cylinder Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 8 miles |
| Most recent distance | 2300 miles |
| Previous car | Mercedes-Benz C-Class |
| Date of Entry | 24th September, 2004 |