Similar Subaru Legacy reviews

1999
USA Flag Canada Flag

Legacy Outback

Not a good bargain

30 words
1998
USA Flag Canada Flag

Legacy GT Wagon

A lot of money for a lot less car

860 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Legacy GT Limited Sedan

I love this thing!

368 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Legacy L

Good, reliable, practical vehicle

363 words
Australia Flag New Zealand Flag

Legacy LX

Great family wagon with street appeal, speed and handling

196 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Legacy outback

Sucks when the break

184 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

Legacy GT

This car has been an unreliable dissappointment

179 words
All Subaru Legacy reviews

1998 Subaru Legacy L review from North America

"Good, reliable, practical vehicle"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Replaced a CV joint at 169,000 miles.

Replaced the brakes at 196,000 miles, the front calipers were stuck, so it needed a lot of parts/labor.

Replaced a second CV joint at 196,000.

Engine rebuilt at 197,000 (due to operator error, see below)

General comments?

Subaru makes great, practical vehicles, especially if you are going to be driving in winter weather. My parents owned two Foresters, replacing our Toyota 4Runner with one when they lived on 7 miles of snowy/icy gravel roads. This last winter I commuted 30 miles every day with regular snow/sleet/ice and was extremely happy to have the AWD.

They are not the most comfortable or luxurious vehicles, even compared to others within the same price range. The interior is decent, but nothing special. We do have some rattling/shaking, but nothing that I wouldn't expect on a vehicle of this age. The wagon model is long enough to haul 8' lumber inside as well as 4'X4' wide sheets of plywood. Our friends have a newer model and can fit two car seats easily in the back. We have also put a variety of items on the roofrack and have had no problems with it.

The engine is powerful enough to get around easily on the interstate, no problems merging or passing. There is a bit of a lag when the accelerator is pushed, but I have experienced this with other Subarus as well. I have heard the 2.5L is a better engine, but I'm happy with this one and the (little) better gas mileage. We get around 24mpg combined.

The maintenance is nothing more than with other AWD vehicles. The CV shafts will fail every once in a while, especially if the boot is torn or you drive through a lot of water. It is in your best interest to get torn boots replaced immediately. I did regular oil changes and fluid refills, which were very easy. The downfall of the vehicle came when I left the old filter gasket on when doing an oil change, which led to the oil draining and the engine failing. We decided to get the engine rebuilt though, as the vehicle will (hopefully) last a long time.

Comment on this review

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

1998 - Legacy GT Limited Sedan 2.5 litre twin cam

I love this thing!

USA Flag Canada Flag

1997 - Legacy L 2.2L

I guess I was just expecting a bit more reliablility from Subaru.

All 1998 Subaru Legacy reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Model year1998
Year of manufacture1998
First year of ownership2006
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.2 Automatic
Performance marks 7 / 10
Reliability marks 6 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks) 6.3 / 10
Distance when acquired160000 miles
Most recent distance197000 miles
Previous carMazda B3000
Date of Entry 11th April, 2008

All Subaru Legacy reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews