1997 Subaru Outback review from North America
"An exemplary machine, but not automotive art"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
If the car is parked in the garage overnight after spraying water in the front wheel wells to wash out snow and salt, the car will not start in the morning. The dealer has no answer, but I've discovered holding the accelerator down to the floor while cranking will bring it back to life with no further trouble until the next wheel well washing.
General comments?
Subaru could beat Honda and Toyota if they could extend their reputation for durability to the appearance of their cars. I have owned cars for 13 years that had less wear and tear than the Subaru after two.
The paint scratches through the color coat with any touch.
The vinyl tears.
The fabric stains.
The plastic scuffs.
Any hidden part rusts (rear hatch handle replaced under warranty)
The wheels corrode.
Other than finish durability, the car rides smoother, corners flatter, and is more confident in all weather conditions than any other car I've owned. I'd buy nothing but Subaru's if they would improve the finish quality.
Recommended reviews
| Nice if I was ever able to afford the repairs to drive it |
|
| Subaru Head Gasket |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1997 |
| First year of ownership | 1997 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.5 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 85 miles |
| Most recent distance | 28000 miles |
| Previous car | Volvo 745 Turbo |
| Date of Entry | 13th March, 2001 |