2000 Subaru Outback review from North America
"Excellent grip, quality build, good enough power"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
None.
General comments?
I previously owned a 97 Legacy GT wagon, a 98 Outback Limited, and I have a 93 Legacy wagon in addition to this Outback. Needless to say, I'm enthusiastic about Subarus. If you live in Canada, like I do, I don't know why you would settle for front-wheel-drive.
I've found the reliability rivals that of Toyota and Honda. With each new generation of Subarus, they noticeably improve performance and build quality. This one feels tight inside and out.
Compared to a sport sedan, there's a little less grip on corners. But it's very smooth riding.
165 horsepower is good. If you hit the pedal, you can always pass.
Front seats are comfortable, but could be a little firmer and supportive for an 8 hour drive.
Controls all make sense. Everything has a quality feel.
Resale has been good on previous Subarus.
For the price, features and quality, I don't feel like I could go wrong with this car.
Recommended reviews
| The 2000 Subaru Outback is not what I hoped for |
|
| Great car to drive if you're rich enough to keep a mechanic on retainer! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2000 |
| Year of manufacture | 1999 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.5 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 70 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 110 kilometres |
| Previous car | Subaru Legacy |
| Date of Entry | 7th August, 2005 |