2007 Toyota Camry CE from North America - All Comments

On Topic (7) | Off Topic (115) | All (122)

Comments: 1-15, 16-30, 31-45, 46-60, 61-75, 76-90, 91-105, 106-120, 121-122

27th Jan 2007, 07:33

<<I fear the import crowd is living in a world where the laws of physics don't apply. Anyone who would argue that heavier, more massive vehicles will crumple easier than smaller, flimsier vehicles is not reasoning logically. A vehicle with a full steel frame and heavier gauge metal is ALREADY a "safety cell" in and of itself. You don't NEED safety cells in vehicles that don't crumple.>.

Really, then why did highway deaths INCREASE after SUVs became the dominate vehicle on American roads?

Using your logic, they should have gone down, and dramatically since they represent over 60% of new vehicles sold.

Wish you SUV posters could post some facts instead of this 'because I said so' stuff.

Vote:

27th Jan 2007, 11:02

7:30 so if a Honda Civic hits head on with a Suburban/Denali/Yukon the Civic driver will come out healthier? He mentioned colliding with a small import. The bumper heights don't even coincide... may blow tires though as posted earlier and the SUV driver may be sitting over the Civics hood. Would be an interesting experiment... but I would not risk it.

Vote:

27th Jan 2007, 13:43

Of course highway deaths went up after SUV's became popular. All the people who ran stop signs in front of them in their little tin imports were totally squished.

Vote:

27th Jan 2007, 15:04

<<Of course highway deaths went up after SUV's became popular. All the people who ran stop signs in front of them in their little tin imports were totally squished.>.

No, the deaths were attributed to the SUVs themselves and, on average, a person was 43% more likely to die in an SUV than a typical car.

Vote:

28th Jan 2007, 15:18

That's interesting. Camry drivers and passengers are over 50% more likely to die in crashes than those driving an average car too. Does that mean Camrys roll over too!!

Vote:

28th Jan 2007, 19:56

<<That's interesting. Camry drivers and passengers are over 50% more likely to die in crashes than those driving an average car too. Does that mean Camrys roll over too!!>.

Proof please, since this is obviously more disinformation being spread by the domestic crowd. The Camry has a five star crash rating and has multiple airbags for every passenger.

Vote:

1st Feb 2007, 18:14

Safety statistics DO indicate that you are 50% more likely to die in a Camry than in the average car, and TWICE as likely to die in a Camry than in a Buick.

Vote:

4th Feb 2007, 15:14

What the stats do not state is that the Buick travels at an average speed of 30 miles per hour--get driven 8,000 miles a year--the average buyer is in their 60's and the car sits in the basement of a senior apartment complex... all this happens while young people and families buy camry's and drive around putting many mile on them.. simple facts make simple truths... Did you really think Iraq had weapons of mass destruction... I bet you thought so because a report said it did. If you sit back and think about demographics and things these statistics could be deciphered..

Vote:

4th Feb 2007, 16:45

<<Safety statistics DO indicate that you are 50% more likely to die in a Camry than in the average car, and TWICE as likely to die in a Camry than in a Buick.>.

Exactly how does a car with a five star crash rating accomplish this?

You can't simply say MORE people die in Camrys because there are MORE of them on the road.

You have to take crash data from an individual crash.

Vote:

5th Feb 2007, 16:31

A 5-star crash rating is meaningless in regard to the likelihood of death or injury in a particular type of car. The tests determining the star ratings are extremely limited and very atypical of real world collisions. There are references to the website on the Toyota Tundra site referring to the data showing how poorly Camry fares (50% below average) in protecting its passengers. The domestic Buick is rated as 50% LESS likely to kill its occupants, making it fully TWICE as safe as Camry.

Vote:

6th Feb 2007, 08:15

<<A 5-star crash rating is meaningless in regard to the likelihood of death or injury in a particular type of car. The tests determining the star ratings are extremely limited and very atypical of real world collisions. There are references to the website on the Toyota Tundra site referring to the data showing how poorly Camry fares (50% below average) in protecting its passengers. The domestic Buick is rated as 50% LESS likely to kill its occupants, making it fully TWICE as safe as Camry.>>

I see, so when it comes to foreign cars tests are meaningless and not "real world" yet when it comes to sacred Buick suddenly the rating is 100% accurate.

You have to PROVE to me that the Camry is "50% less safe" than a Buick, and you have not. ALL you are doing is simply stating the frequency of accidents and, given over 400K Camrys are sold per year, that means that there are more Camrys on the road.

Using your logic, I could say a Wartburg or a Fiat is the safest car on the road in America since the frequency of accidents is so low - there aren't many out there.

Vote:

6th Feb 2007, 17:48

You know what? Even if those statistics are correct, I'd be embarrassed to be seen in a Buick. I'll take any Toyota car ever made over a Buick. Besides, you never know when an accident is coming your way, no two accidents are the same, and there are far too many variables to consider for me to worry about getting killed in a Camry. It has a 5 star rating; enough said. It's top of the line in safety as it is in every other possible category for cars. Keep your Buick, I'll drive a much better looking, sportier, and much better overall vehicle in the Toyota Camry.

Vote:

6th Feb 2007, 21:39

I'm 18 and I'll drive the "grandpa" buick over a camery anyday.

They look better and the camery looks like a girl car. With some nice rims or even the factory rims (shined up) and a nice tint a Buick Park Avenue (which I own) or LeSabre looks better than a bland powerless Camry.

Vote:

6th Feb 2007, 22:10

I'd be embarrassed to be seen in a Camry, especially those bland beige colored (there's so many of them) Camrys and I'm 23. I wouldn't really want a Buick either, but would take one over the Toyota. I'd then trade it in on a Nissan or Honda. Toyota might have the engineering part down, but their styling, yuck it leaves something to be desired. The Camry has always been an ugly car with the exception of the mid 90's ones which are so bland there's nothing to dislike.

Vote:

6th Feb 2007, 23:36

Someone told me that the designer who had designed the Pontiac Aztek had left GM and gone to work for Toyota. I thought they were kidding until I saw the new Camrys.

Vote:

Next 15 comments

All Toyota Camry reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews