1990 Toyota Celica ST review from North America
"An excellent sports car at a discount price"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Replaced the tires which improved the ride handling and acceleration.
Replaced original factory exhaust.
Brakes need replacement.
Dome light does not always turn on.
General comments?
The car is 16 years old and runs better than most newer cars that I have driven. I would recommend a Celica to anyone. The car has never broken down, give an excellent ride, and is very fuel efficient.
Recommended reviews
| 1991 - Celica GT Liftback 2.2L Great looking, fun car |
|
| 1989 - Celica Convertible GT 2.0 16v The only gas savor to be fast, nice, fun, inexpensive, and reliable!!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1990 |
| Year of manufacture | 1990 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6L Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 140000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 160000 miles |
| Previous car | Mazda Protege |
| Date of Entry | 5th November, 2004 |