1991 Toyota Tercel DX review from North America
"A low maintenance money saver"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Seat belt has worn pretty badly.
The emergency cable snapped.
General comments?
This car will last forever because I beat the balongy out of mine and it still runs like the day I got it.
The only problem is that it isn't very fast at all.
Recommended reviews
| Stay away from Tercel's of this era. If you see one, cover your nose and immediately call Greenpeace |
|
| 1990 - Tercel DX (2-door sedan) 1.5L Solid, economical car -- good, but not great |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1991 |
| First year of ownership | 1997 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.5 L Manual |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 450000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 560000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Chevelle |
| Date of Entry | 1st August, 2001 |