1999 Toyota Tercel CE review from North America
"It cost a little more than most small cars, but you get what you pay for"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The locks can be difficult to open from the outside of the car - they don't seem to like my car key.
The seats are low which is good if you are tall, but bad if you are short like me.
General comments?
Excellent fuel efficiency and reliability. Handles well in adverse conditions like snow.
Front seats are too low and there is little room in the back - not a family sedan.
Recommended reviews
| Reliable, cheap to run, and comfortable |
| Cheap, reliable transportation |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1999 |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.5L Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 7 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 128000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 12th August, 2003 |