1991 Toyota Tercel review from North America
"For simple, dependable, economical fun while running errands, it's hard to beat"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
When I first bought it from a neighbor the valve cover gaskets leaked oil enough to require that I fix it right away.
I have had problems with the door handles. One would think that such a reliable auto would have better than very breakable plastic parts inside the door that are mechanically used to lock and open the door.
The paint on the original rims has become spoiled and come off in places, making the wheels look shoddy.
General comments?
Don't get the 4 speed manual if you drive out of town on the highway often. It gets pretty wound up at 60 mph.
I love the reliability of the drive train and the economy. Mine still has a good gray paint job going for it.
Recommended reviews
| Stay away from Tercel's of this era. If you see one, cover your nose and immediately call Greenpeace |
|
| 1990 - Tercel DX (2-door sedan) 1.5L Solid, economical car -- good, but not great |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1991 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | Manual |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 52000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 88000 miles |
| Previous car | Toyota Corolla |
| Date of Entry | 26th September, 2003 |