2000 Toyota Tundra SR5 review from North America
"Looks Good, Brakes are dangerous"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
70300 miles on my 2000 tundra and they, as I write this, are putting the 8th set of front rotors on, UNDER Warranty. Not without a fight though.
General comments?
My disappointment with Toyota is without bounds. The brakes on the Tundra are a disgrace to the Toyota reputation. The way they will deny the problems with the braking system publicly and then take you aside and advise you to get out from under it because they don't know how long they will support fixing the brakes is appalling. There should be a recall to correct this flaw in an otherwise good looking well performing truck.
Recommended reviews
| 2000 - Tundra SR5 Access Cab 4WD 4.7-liter i-Force V8 It's a Toyota, it'll still be running when the domestic competition is retired to the junkyard! |
|
| You can't buy a harder working more reliable truck for the money |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Year of manufacture | 2000 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | V8 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 2 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 10 miles |
| Most recent distance | 70000 miles |
| Previous car | Isuzu Rodeo |
| Date of Entry | 18th January, 2003 |