Similar Volvo 240 reviews

1988
USA Flag Canada Flag

240 dl

Very safe and dependable

86 words
1987
USA Flag Canada Flag

240 DL

Safety, reliability, long life expectancy

1659 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

240 DL

Expensive to maintain, even if it is reliable

535 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

240 DL

It's not the

458 words
UK Flag Ireland Flag

240 GL

An indestructible well built comfortable tank!

337 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

240 240DL

More reliable and forgiving than your parents

302 words
USA Flag Canada Flag

240 DL

It's a great car that is reliable and (of course) safe!

270 words
All Volvo 240 reviews

1987 Volvo 240 DL review from North America

"It's not the"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

So far, have only replaced the battery.

I accidentally kicked the drivers door map pocket, causing it to crack due to it's age.

General comments?

Where to begin?

I was 19 when my father helped me purchase my first Volvo.

It was a 1976 244.

We bought the car for $650 dollars, and it already had 150k miles.

At the time I thought that it was a worthless piece of rusted pre-civil war art. The only reason I'm not driving it now (17 yrs later) is because of the body rust and a failing steering knuckle. I was amazed that this 4 speed stick could handle and jump off the line better than my friends American cars.

When the car was no longer safe to drive (steering knuckle) it had 228,000 miles and still purred like a kitten. I have talked with about this car with fondness ever since we sold it for parts.

Now for the good part!

When I initially met my wife, her family had a black 1987 Volvo 240 DL sitting in the drive way. Due to her mother's illness, the car hadn't been driven for 3 yrs at that point. She has since passed away, and my Father-in-Law couldn't bring himself to sell the car for sentimental reasons.

This year, he also passed away, and left the car to my wife and I.

She isn't interested in the car, but I definitely am.

Okay, for all of you that are familiar with Volvos, tell me what you would do.

The car has been sitting for approximately 10 yrs.

It has been outside with cloth car cover protecting it.

The body has no visible rust. The paint is only slightly oxidized, but I am going to have it detailed.

It will need brakes (because of the way my in-laws drove with the left foot on the brake).

And the tires all have evidence of sun damage.

I had to jump the car with my truck to move it, and immediately it started up like someone had driven it the day before. I drove it around the block, and the steering is a little stiff, but besides the brakes, you wouldn't have known that the car had not been run in 10 yrs.

I plan to change all of the fluids, filters, hoses, and belts. With a new set of brakes and tires, this car should last at least another 10 years.

But WAIT!

Here's the best part...

The car only has 65,000 original miles!!!

My father-in-law also left a loaded 2001 Monte Carlo with 55k miles, and we are already planning to sell it.

I would MUCH rather have an old Volvo, than a newer Monte!

I can't wait to get it running on the road!!

4 comments

Recommended reviews

USA Flag Canada Flag

1987 - 240 DL 2.3 liter, B230F

Expensive to maintain, even if it is reliable

USA Flag Canada Flag

1987 - 240 240DL

More reliable and forgiving than your parents

All 1987 Volvo 240 reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Model year1987
Year of manufacture1987
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission Automatic
Performance marks  
Reliability marks  
Comfort marks  
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper)  
Distance when acquired65000 miles
Most recent distance65000 miles
Previous carFord Ranger
Date of Entry 6th November, 2004

All Volvo 240 reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews