Similar Volvo S40 reviews

2000
UK FlagIreland Flag

S40 T4

Good car when running

65 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

S40

Trade in your BMW

51 words
South Africa Flag

S40 2.0 t

Volvo not for life!

32 words
1999
Malaysia Flag

S40 2.0T

A reasonable performer, safe and reliable, but not sexy at all

390 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

S40 T

Best car driven in over 52 years of motoring!

386 words
Australia FlagNew Zealand Flag

S40 SE

Costly maintenance. But goes like a little rocket

182 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

S40 SE

Not the last word in style, but solid and dependable!

171 words
All Volvo S40 reviews

1999 Volvo S40 2.0T review from Malaysia

"A reasonable performer, safe and reliable, but not sexy at all"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Both front and back fog-lamps had already blown.

The interior (original) is tacky, nothing to look at; but I am not fussed.

The front end of the car gives the impression (and sound!) of scraping bottom when driving over speed bumps; I was told this is a common problem, and nothing actually touches the ground.

The engine revolutions rises and drops at random when the car is idle or very slow (I suppose due to increased and decreased engine loads) ; this can be rather disconcerting when doing a tricky reverse maneuver into a tight parking spot as there would a slight jerk, requiring careful braking to avoid smashing into something. I was told nothing could be done about this (!).

The engine vibrates when the car is stopped, with the gear engaged. I was told this is a usual problem with the car, due to a defective engine mounting. This was corroborated when I checked with the local Volvo dealer and found that the engine mounting is one of the most common parts replaced in the S40.

The air-conditioning is not good enough for a tropical climate. Again, I was told nothing can be done about this.

The fan is so damned loud when it comes on! Very irritating.

General comments?

First, be warned that I am a Volvophile.

That said, I found the car to be a reasonable performer. Its acceleration and speed are nothing spectacular compared to high-end performance cars, obviously, but are nonetheless satisfactory; the engine is powerful enough to have some fun with. However, when joyriding, I cannot help, but wish there was much, much more power. This is definitely not (and is probably not meant to be) a sexy car.

The car feels safe at all times (psychological only, because it is a Volvo?), and handles well enough even in difficult corners and bad (and wet) road conditions. The Dynamic Stability Assistance is a boon.

So far, maintenance costs have been reasonable, and from the recorded maintenance history of the car, I have not found anything extraordinarily mind-boggling. Based on the maintenance schedule, and the way the car is presently behaving, I do not anticipate any major cost item to arise in the near future.

I am satisfied with my purchase, which I regard as a stepping stone toward my ultimate aim of owning the S60R!

Comment on this review

Recommended reviews

UK FlagIreland Flag

2000 - S40 SE 2.0

Sporty looking alternative!

USA FlagCanada Flag

1999 - S40 T 1.9T

Best car driven in over 52 years of motoring!

All 1999 Volvo S40 reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 2 litre light-pressure petrol turbo Automatic
Performance marks 7/10
Reliability marks 8/10
Comfort marks 6/10
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 6/10
Distance when acquired51200 kilometres
Most recent distance53500 kilometres
Previous carVolvo 240
Date of Entry 2nd July, 2003

All Volvo S40 reviews

Other CSDO Media Sites: Airline Flight Reviews | Mobile Phone Reviews | Motorcycle Reviews