1998 Volvo S40 SE review from UK and Ireland
"Too much to pay for it's performance"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
No problems have so far occured on the car.
General comments?
This car is a terrible performer.
It is slow and bulky.
Performances are poor to average.
Handling is OK - actually gets better in the wet.
Gets better in terms of power when up to 90 mph - engine sounds better and more relaxed.
Dealers have always been good.
Car needs to be quicker, much quicker, have better handling.
It deserves to compete with the likes of Saab and BMW, but it can't because its too slow.
Search for New and Used Volvo S40s available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended reviews
| Stylish sporty saloon- and reliable! |
| Elegant looking executive saloon that handles like a sports car |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1998 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 Manual |
| Performance marks | 4 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Most recent distance | 59755 miles |
| Previous car | Volvo S40 |
| Date of Entry | 30th July, 2004 |