2002 Volvo S60 review from Finland
"Good leaser for 'double income no kids'"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Electronics broke down a lot.
Suspension/axles wore down too fast.
Rear light casing flushed at every wash.
Exterior paint wears easily if not metallic.
Expensive unexpected repairs for seemingly small faults
General comments?
Good comfortable car for driver and front passenger.
Handles well in all seasons, specially in winter.
Exterior: Never get tired of looking at it.
Recommended reviews
| A filet mignon |
|
| 2001 - S60 2.0T S 2.0 turbo 20v petrol A bargain for the performance and quality on offer |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2003 |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.4 Manual |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 64500 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 94000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Mercedes-Benz W124 |
| Date of Entry | 16th November, 2005 |