2002 Volvo V40 review from North America
"Very solid, quality family wagon"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Brake pads were replaced at 32,000 km ($170 Can, about $100 U.S.).
Several trouble lights came on when the car got stuck in the snow and the wheels spun, and the computer got 'confused'. They had to be re-set at the dealer (no cost, but a hassle). You'd think that a Scandinavian car could deal with snow.
General comments?
This car has a very solid and secure feel. It makes other cars I have owned feel like tin boxes.
The interior fit and finish is first-rate, and it is very nicely equipped for the price.
About the only gripe I have is that this car is rather thirsty considering it's only got a 1.9 liter, and performance is less than my Acura, which is also more economical on gas.
Regular servicing is quite expensive, but with my driving habits, only happens once a year.
Recommended reviews
| 2002 - V40 1.9T 1.9 litre turbo 4 V is for Vigor, Versatility, and Value |
| Absolutely wonderful! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2002 |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.9 turbo Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 10 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 17000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 33000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Ford Windstar |
| Date of Entry | 21st February, 2005 |