2004 Volvo V40 review from North America
"Good alternative to a mini-van"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
-Fit and finish is subpar.
-Noisy engine.
-Bumpy ride with 16 wheels.
-Low grade interior leather.
-Expensive car.
General comments?
-Good performance.
-Good gas mileage.
-Great safety features.
-Sporty and practical.
-Good looking car.
Recommended reviews
| Love Volvo, love the car! |
|
| 2002 - V40 1.9T 1.9 litre turbo 4 V is for Vigor, Versatility, and Value |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Model year | 2004 |
| Year of manufacture | 2004 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.9 T Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 5 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 27000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 29000 miles |
| Previous car | Mazda MPV |
| Date of Entry | 9th November, 2005 |